\([(–8)\times(–3)]\times(–4)\) is not equal to
\((–8)\times[(–3)\times(–4)]\)
\([(–8)\times(–4)]\times(–3)\)
\([(–3)\times(–8)]\times(–4)\)
\((–8)\times(–3) - (–8)\times(–4)\)
Step 1: Find the value of the original expression.
(ig[( -8 ) imes ( -3 )ig] imes ( -4))
First multiply (-8) and (-3):
((-8) imes(-3)=24)
Now multiply the result by (-4):
(24 imes(-4)=-96)
So the original expression equals (-96).
Step 2: Check each option.
(a) (( -8 ) imes ig[( -3 ) imes ( -4 )ig])
Multiply inside the brackets first:
((-3) imes(-4)=12)
Now multiply by (-8):
((-8) imes 12=-96)
This matches the original ((-96)).
(b) (ig[( -8 ) imes ( -4 )ig] imes ( -3 ))
Multiply inside the brackets first:
((-8) imes(-4)=32)
Now multiply by (-3):
(32 imes(-3)=-96)
This also matches (-96).
(c) (ig[( -3 ) imes ( -8 )ig] imes ( -4 ))
Multiply inside the brackets first (order doesn’t matter for multiplication):
((-3) imes(-8)=24)
Now multiply by (-4):
(24 imes(-4)=-96)
This again matches (-96).
(d) (( -8 ) imes ( -3 ) - ( -8 ) imes ( -4 ))
Here there is a minus sign between the two products, so it is not just regrouping multiplication.
Compute each product:
((-8) imes(-3)=24)
((-8) imes(-4)=32)
Now subtract:
(24-32=-8)
(-8) is not equal to (-96).
Conclusion: Options (a), (b), and (c) only change the grouping (associativity) or order (commutativity) of multiplication, so they stay equal to the original value (-96). Option (d) uses subtraction, so its value is (-8), which is different. Therefore, the correct answer is (d).