E and F are points on the sides PQ and PR respectively of a \(\triangle PQR\). For each of the following cases, state whether \(EF \parallel QR\):
(i) No
(ii) Yes
(iii) Yes
Concept used: Converse of Basic Proportionality Theorem (Thales’ theorem).
If a line through the sides \(PQ\) and \(PR\) of \(\triangle PQR\) cuts them at points E and F such that
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{PF}{PR},\]
then \(EF \parallel QR\). If the ratios are not equal, then \(EF\) is not parallel to \(QR\).
First find full side lengths:
\[PQ = PE + EQ = 3.9 + 3 = 6.9\,\text{cm}\]
\[PR = PF + FR = 3.6 + 2.4 = 6.0\,\text{cm}\]
Compute the ratios:
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{3.9}{6.9} = \frac{39}{69} = \frac{13}{23}\]
\[\frac{PF}{PR} = \frac{3.6}{6.0} = \frac{36}{60} = \frac{3}{5}\]
Clearly,
\[\frac{13}{23} \neq \frac{3}{5}\]
Conclusion: The ratios are not equal, so \(EF\) is not parallel to \(QR\). Answer: No.
Find full side lengths:
\[PQ = PE + QE = 4 + 4.5 = 8.5\,\text{cm}\]
\[PR = PF + RF = 8 + 9 = 17\,\text{cm}\]
Compute ratios:
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{4}{8.5} = \frac{4}{\frac{17}{2}} = \frac{8}{17}\]
\[\frac{PF}{PR} = \frac{8}{17}\]
So,
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{PF}{PR} = \frac{8}{17}\]
Conclusion: Ratios are equal, so by converse of BPT, \(EF \parallel QR\). Answer: Yes.
Here entire side lengths are already given: \(PQ = 1.28\,\text{cm}\), \(PR = 2.56\,\text{cm}\).
Compute the ratios:
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{0.18}{1.28} = \frac{18}{128} = \frac{9}{64}\]
\[\frac{PF}{PR} = \frac{0.36}{2.56} = \frac{36}{256} = \frac{9}{64}\]
So,
\[\frac{PE}{PQ} = \frac{PF}{PR} = \frac{9}{64}\]
Conclusion: Ratios are equal, so \(EF \parallel QR\). Answer: Yes.